[governance] nomcom's creteria - was multistakeholding

[Avri Doria]

hi,

 From my reading, i think you are both right.  What a treat.

The caucus is supposed to determine the criteria as the nomcom is  
being constituted.

And the nomcom is supposed to publish the criteria it will be using  
and the caucus is supposed to review it.

Something like a system of checks and balances.

I guess it is also possible that the caucus will reach a consensus on  
the criteria, review it and give something to the nomcom that it  
should not deviate from.

a.



On 9 Jun 2008, at 10:08, Milton L Mueller wrote:

>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: McTim [mailto:dogwallah at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 8:26 AM
>> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Milton L Mueller
>> Subject: Re: [governance] nomcom's creteria - was multistakeholding
>>
>> Milton,
>>
>>
>> it's NOT being proposed, it's the way our charter is written
>>
>> "One month will be used to constitute the nomcom and determine the
>> criteria for the selections they are to make.." and
>>
>> "Criteria used by nomcom will be made public and will be reviewed by
>> the caucus.."
>
> Obviously, this all takes place BEFORE the Nomcom is constituted.
> "constitute the nomcom AND determine the
> criteria for the selections they are to make."
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance