[governance] nomcom's creteria - was multistakeholding

[McTim]

Hi Robert,

On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Robert Guerra <lists at privaterra.info> wrote:
> This year's IGC nomcom was challenging and did have its drama. It
> raised important issues and revealed that there are significant
> differences of opinion.. BUT, the report was issued and the names
> forwarded to the secretarait (I hope).
>

no argument here.

> That being said, if issues remain - might I suggest they not be
> discussed not under the umbrella of a single subject line - but a
> variety of different ones. That way, it makes it easier for those of
> us who don't have the time or energy to reply real-time as some on her
> seem to be able to to.

Well there are ~6 threads going on at the moment that touch on it. ;-)

>
> What i'm trying to say - is that the thread is becoming too complex,

It's actually quite simple, and I think Avri summarised it well.

"we have a procedural problem that needs to fixed if his group is ever
going to try and use a nomcom process again and that is that we follow
the rules:"

That's the "basic" issue, as much as some would like it not to be.
I would be happy to participate in a sub-group to sort out the issue that
Parminder thinks is "the real" issue" AFTER we sort out our procedural one.

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
$ whois -h whois.afrinic.net mctim
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance