[governance] multistakeholding was Re: N & CoI

[William Drake]

Hi

Quoting Avri Doria <avri at psg.com>:

>
> On 5 Jun 2008, at 23:25, Michael Gurstein wrote:
>
> > if not I move that we move on and that there be no
> > further discussion on the MAG nominations along with a simple
> > declaration
> > that the next NomCom undertake to only make substantive decisions
> > concerning
> > the criteria for selection after broad consultation with the group.
>
>
> i can certainly support this statement.

I second the motion.  Learn from the experience, agree that future nomcoms
should consult on procedural matters and charter compliance, and move on. 
There plainly is not going to be consensus on changing the charter to address
the one issue (although a broader review in light of experience might be
merited someday) or anything else, so belaboring tthis further would just build
up more bad boogyjoogy and impede future dialogue and cooperation.

Bill

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance