[governance] Re: Nomcom and conflict of interest

[Jeremy Malcolm]

On 03/06/2008, at 10:52 PM, Avri Doria wrote:

>> I have therefore put forward a model of a consociational bureau for  
>> the IGF that would preserve the distinct identities and autonomy of  
>> each of the stakeholder groups within the MAG, whilst mediating the  
>> power imbalances between them (see pp.294-297, 312, 464-467,  
>> 471-474, 478-482 of my book, http://books.google.com/books?id=G8ETBPD6jHIC) 
>> .
>
> btw, is all of this still in a wiki somewhere.  or do we all need to  
> go buy your book to understand your arguments?

Yes it's still online and linked from the book's Web site, though the  
book is a bit different and has some new material.  If you're looking  
for short and concise though, the bare bones of the consociation  
argument were in something I wrote for CircleID last year at http://www.circleid.com/posts/79219_consociational_bureau_internet_governance/ 
.

I have also promised Milton I will write a longer and broader article  
based on Chapter 6, when I can fit it in between other commitments  
(I'm taking the New York bar exam next month to fill in time while  
looking for my next job).  I should also submit something for GIGANET,  
but probably not on quite the same topic (probably on space law and  
IG, believe it or not).

-- 
Jeremy Malcolm LLB (Hons) B Com
Internet and Open Source lawyer, IT consultant, actor
host -t NAPTR 1.0.8.0.3.1.2.9.8.1.6.e164.org|awk -F! '{print $3}'

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance