[governance] Issues concerning standing IGC members list

[Yehuda Katz]

In that case, I want to duly note that the request for Authenticate of the Vote
by POSTAL means was denied, with my Objection.

-

Having witnessed several of these "On-line" IG-Governance type of elections,
Those being: 
1. Icann's At-large Elections [Wherein 64,000 voters were disenfranchised]
2. Icann-at-Large Elections [.Org &.Com / Jeffsey & Joop sites respectively]
3. ICANN ALAC Elections [Past]

-

In fairness to 'Your' argument please refer to this article:

International Association for Cryptologic Research
Secure Online Elections in Practice
http://eprint.iacr.org/2008/157.pdf

http://www.iacr.org/

Wherein the examination of four (4) 'state-of-the-art' e-voting protocols are
evaluated with a number of security objectives.

-
Paraminder, does your system meet the criteria set forth by the IACR.Org?

Again, I offer to offset the POSTAL cost of holding the Vote/Census.
Secondly, I propose that a POSTAL Census be taken on a 'once annually basis'.
-

P.S.:
Honestly I do not understand your objections, what? once a year you have to
send in a letter. Really is a little dedication to this matter, that much of a
hassle.
I don't get it.
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance