[governance] Issues concerning standing IGC members list

Yehuda Katz yehudakatz at mailinator.com
Sun Jul 27 13:21:05 EDT 2008

In that case, I want to duly note that the request for Authenticate of the Vote
by POSTAL means was denied, with my Objection.


Having witnessed several of these "On-line" IG-Governance type of elections,
Those being: 
1. Icann's At-large Elections [Wherein 64,000 voters were disenfranchised]
2. Icann-at-Large Elections [.Org &.Com / Jeffsey & Joop sites respectively]
3. ICANN ALAC Elections [Past]


In fairness to 'Your' argument please refer to this article:

International Association for Cryptologic Research
Secure Online Elections in Practice


Wherein the examination of four (4) 'state-of-the-art' e-voting protocols are
evaluated with a number of security objectives.

Paraminder, does your system meet the criteria set forth by the IACR.Org?

Again, I offer to offset the POSTAL cost of holding the Vote/Census.
Secondly, I propose that a POSTAL Census be taken on a 'once annually basis'.

Honestly I do not understand your objections, what? once a year you have to
send in a letter. Really is a little dedication to this matter, that much of a
I don't get it.
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:

More information about the Governance mailing list