[governance] Much-maligned feature being added to IPv6

[Phil Regnauld]

Jeffrey A. Williams (jwkckid1) writes:
> 
>   Frankly I personally view this as a very positive step for IPv6.
> Breaches a ideological
> technical divide that has existed for nearly a decade, which is a good
> first step
> in gaining more acceptance for IPv6.  The downside is that LEA's won't
> like it very much for obvious reasons.

	Read Alain Durand's proposal for a very interesting solution on the
	transition for large broadband providers:

	http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-durand-dual-stack-lite-00

	(it is cited in the article and is by far more interesting than
	the whole NAT or no NAT discussion).

	
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance