[governance] co-coordinator elections
Ian Peter
ian.peter at ianpeter.com
Mon Jan 28 02:56:53 EST 2008
Do we really need to go to the trouble of snail mail voting for this? I
can’t imagine mass fraud or any attempt at capture – and if there was, we
have an appeals mechanism chaired by Izumi that could reschedule a vote if
we really had problems that couldn’t be sorted out by our trusted counter
I like Avri’s previous suggestion, ie
,to qualify for voting, one has been on the last as a certain date and has a
human name associated with the email address.
then a ballot would be sent individually, by email, to every qualified voter
on the list.
they would then send via regular email in to a trusted counter.
Ian Peter
_____
From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri at psg.com]
Sent: 28 January 2008 03:15
To: Governance Caucus
Subject: Re: [governance] co-coordinator elections
correction:
they would then send the ballot in via regular _mail_ as specified in
Yehuda's suggestion. not email as i mis-wrote.
though i suppose it could be done by email as long as it was from the
address which received the direct emailing.
and of course the recipient would have to guarantee to only list who voted
and the count and not he details of anyone's votes.
i am working with developers on a fix for the faults in the online voting
system we used in the past, and hope i have an improved version to offer
before the elections of 2009. i am sorry it was not ready in time for this
year, but volunteer efforts being what they are, nothing could be done.
a.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Avri Doria <HYPERLINK "mailto:avri at psg.com"avri at psg.com>
Date: 25 January 2008 23:57:06 EST
To: Governance Caucus <HYPERLINK
"mailto:governance at lists.cpsr.org"governance at lists.cpsr.org>
Subject: Re: [governance] co-coordinator elections
hi,
i like the idea and would like to offer an alternative, one could use the
same criteria as when we vote on line, to qualify for voting, one has been
on the last as a certain date and has a human name associated with the email
address.
then a ballot would be sent individually, by email, to every qualified voter
on the list.
they would then send via regular email in to a trusted counter.
a.
On 24 Jan 2008, at 18:42, HYPERLINK
"mailto:yehudakatz at mailinator.com"yehudakatz at mailinator.com wrote:
My suggestion.
Do the election by Mail/Post (SnailMail)
1. Post the ballot with Candidates Choices where it can be downloaded and
printed.
2. The ballot will have a Postal Address to where it should be sent, and
date
it should be sent by.
3. Upon election closing date, post the received ballots to see if anyone's
ballot was not yet received.
if so, then accept that persons ballot by email correspondence.
4. Tally
Basically, People just print the Ballot and send it in.
--
Why?
1. People are not going to 'Flood' the system with ballots if they have to
pay
for postage stamps.
2. The sent/received ballot is proof enough of the persons existence.
3. If a person can afford to be online and on participate on this list, they
certainly can afford a stamp.
This election really does not need to be a big-production.
I'm ok with sending a ballot to you in India or anywhere else in the World.
--
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
HYPERLINK "mailto:governance at lists.cpsr.org"governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
HYPERLINK
"mailto:governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org"governance-unsubscribe at lists.c
psr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
HYPERLINK
"http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance"http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/inf
o/governance
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
HYPERLINK "mailto:governance at lists.cpsr.org"governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
HYPERLINK
"mailto:governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org"governance-unsubscribe at lists.c
psr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
HYPERLINK
"http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance"http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/inf
o/governance
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.12/1245 - Release Date: 26/01/2008
15:45
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.12/1245 - Release Date: 26/01/2008
15:45
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20080128/1f4cc9f8/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list