[governance] Consensus Call - IGC statements

[Lee McKnight]

Yes, congrats Parminder.

Lee

Prof. Lee W. McKnight
School of Information Studies
Syracuse University
+1-315-443-6891office
+1-315-278-4392 mobile
>>> ajp at glocom.ac.jp 02/25/08 5:41 AM >>>
Parminder,

Pretty much the same thoughts as Bill.  But you've done a a great job 
and the statements have my support.

Thanks for all your work.

Adam




>A small addition.
>
>We will add in the statement on the MAG, that
>
>
>"The caucus supports the continuation of Nitin Desai as the Chair of
the
>MAG. We recognize and commend the role that he has played in guiding
the MAG
>and the IGF through difficult formative times."
>
>We have said such a thing in our 2007 statements.
>
>Parminder
>
>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>>  From: Parminder [mailto:parminder at itforchange.net]
>>  Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 1:08 PM
>>  To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
>>  Subject: [governance] Consensus Call - IGC statements
>>  Importance: High
>>
>>
>>
>>  Changing the subject line, and marking as priority.
>>
>>  > -----Original Message-----
>>  > From: Parminder [mailto:parminder at itforchange.net]
>>  > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2008 1:04 PM
>>  > To: 'governance at lists.cpsr.org'
>>  > Subject: IGC statements
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > Hi Everyone
>>  >
>>  > Pl find enclosed the proposed caucus statements for the IGF open
>>  > consultations, seeking the group's consensus on them.
>>  >
>>  > At this stage please indicate A CLEAR YES OR NO to the statements.
Added
>>  > explanations etc are fine, but THE 'YES' OR 'NO' TO THE STATEMENTS
as
>>  > proposed here (and at this stage unchangeable on any member's
>>  suggestions)
>>  > SHOULD BE VERY CLEAR.
>>  >
>>  > If your response is NO, please also indicate which statement, and
if
>>  > possible, which part of it you have specific objection to. This
helps in
>>  > the process of calling a possible rough consensus.
>>  >
>>  > When you accept such a group statement to be made it may not be
exactly
>>  > the statement you will make for yourself, given the choice.
However you
>>  > accept that given the prevailing views in the group this statement
>>  should
>>  > be made on the behalf of the group.
>>  >
>>  > We need a good number of YESes for this statement to go, so pl
indicate
>>  > your vote. Numbers also affirm the group's vitality and backing of
the
>>  > work being done.
>>  >
>>  > Parminder
>>  >
>>  >
>>  ____________________________________________________________
>>  You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>       governance at lists.cpsr.org
>>  To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>       governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>>  For all list information and functions, see:
>>       http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>
>____________________________________________________________
>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
>To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
>For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance