[governance] Reconstituting MAG (Tech/admin language)

[Meryem Marzouki]

Le 20 févr. 08 à 18:39, Adam Peake a écrit :

>> Le 20 févr. 08 à 17:57, Adam Peake a écrit :
>>>
>>>> . We also agree that International organizations having an  
>>>> important role in
>>>> the development of Internet-related technical standards and  
>>>> relevant
>>>> policies should continue to be represented in the MAG. However,  
>>>> their
>>>> representation should not be at the expense of broader civil  
>>>> society
>>>> participation.
>>>
>>> Again I disagree. And I think I may also be confused...
>>> The technical/admin Internet organizations are not "International  
>>> organizations" in the sense the label's used in UN. And if they  
>>> were they would typically be observers not members. Either way,  
>>> it doesn't make sense to me.
>>
>> That's TA's exact wording, Adam. Used to distinguish them from  
>> intergovernmental organizations.
>
>
> paragraph 35 e?

Yes. This Para 35 has been referenced by Parminder since his earliest  
proposal draft.
35: those who have a role (not necessarily the same). 35a gov, 35b  
biz, 35c cs, 35d IGOs, 35e "technical communiity" (ICANN and the like).
36: "valuable contribution by the academic and technical communities  
within those stakeholder groups mentioned in paragraph 35"

Who can honestly claim here that we're saying anything else in the  
statement than "back to the basics", "back to the obvious"?____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance