[governance] Reconstituting MAG (Tech/admin language)

[Guru]

Hi Avri,

Do you think the IGF secretariat will take offence to this 'allegation' of
having perceived 'entities .....such as ICANN, RIR and IETF are CS'. I am
happy to hear that. For it may help to solve a strange riddle that some of
us are caught in  -  whether ICANN plus is CS! ...  Some IGC members seem to
believe so... If only the IGF secretariat can issue a disclaimer a major
problem in the IGC will solved :-)

Regards, 
Guru

-----Original Message-----
From: Avri Doria [mailto:avri at psg.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 8:53 PM
To: Governance Caucus
Subject: Re: [governance] Reconstituting MAG (Tech/admin language)


On 19 Feb 2008, at 08:49, Milton L Mueller wrote:

> The problem is > that the Internet administration organizations'
insistence that they > are CS, or their perception as such by the IGF
Secretariat, is partly > responsible for reducing the size of the CS element
on the MAG.

Hi,

Can you point out to me where the IGF secretariat has perceived that
entities (word chosen to avoid the current discussion of whether they are
IOs or not) such as ICANN, RIR and IETF are CS?

Thanks
a.

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance