[governance] Inputs for synthesis paper
Michael Gurstein
gurstein at gmail.com
Sun Aug 31 15:13:42 EDT 2008
I've invited you Sylvia and Jaco, to be "collaborators" on the document and
to enter in your own changes.
Best,
MG
-----Original Message-----
From: Sylvia Caras [mailto:sylvia.caras at gmail.com]
Sent: August 31, 2008 10:59 AM
To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
Subject: Re: [governance] Inputs for synthesis paper
I'm interested in seeing the Google docs format used this way. I found it
easy to read through and we will all be able to see edits.
A suggestion that is philosophic not stylistic is whether to capitalize
'internet'. I think we should not. The internet technology seems to me no
longer a brand but rather absorbed into ordinary civil life and doesn't need
the differentiation.
More stylistic, I wonder about substituting 'foundational' for
'constitutional'. The former seems to me more flexible and inclusive, the
latter stricter and more formal. For rights, I am thinking about
overarching or underpinning rights, which then become implemented in
constitutions and laws and standards and ... Cornerstone rights would also
work for me.
Please note that I am reading/writing with an American English mind/brain,
and how I react to terms may not be how others understand the words.
I too prefer shorter interventions.
Sylvia ____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list