[governance] IGF workshops

[Adam Peake]

At 6:26 PM -0400 4/28/08, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8A97E.DCB46FEA"
>
>
>
>
>
>From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch]
>
>Is the idea that the IGC would be submitting 
>only responses to the questions that are 
>supposed to be answered by 30 April, # 1, 2, 4 
>and 9?  Of are you thinking of plugging in all 
>the material now at hand for all nine, 
>irrespective of what state it¹s in and whether 
>it¹s ready for prime time?   
>
>I am assuming that we the organizers submit it 
>ourselves, and that we only reply to questions 
>1,2,4 and 9 by the April 30 deadline. --MM
>


You can answer as many questions as you are able. 
But 1, 2, 4 and 9 are the core.

Question 9 is a bit confusing, asking which of 
the five themes the proposal falls under and not 
completely consistent with the draft program that 
came out of the last MAG meeting.  So try to list 
under the five themes, and add whatever 
additional theme (emerging issues, way forward, 
development, capacity building etc.), as a 
comment added to the text description.

Adam




>____________________________________________________________
>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
>To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
>For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance