[governance] IGF workshops

[Meryem Marzouki]

Le 29 avr. 08 à 00:26, Milton L Mueller a écrit :
>
> From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake at graduateinstitute.ch]
> Is the idea that the IGC would be submitting only responses to the  
> questions that are supposed to be answered by 30 April, # 1, 2, 4  
> and 9?  Of are you thinking of plugging in all the material now at  
> hand for all nine, irrespective of what state it’s in and whether  
> it’s ready for prime time?
>
> I am assuming that we the organizers submit it ourselves, and that  
> we only reply to questions 1,2,4 and 9 by the April 30 deadline. --MM

What do you mean by "we the organizers"? The workshops have co- 
sponsors (i.e. co-organizers), among them the IGC, which is co- 
sponsoring the 4 workshops proposal.
So, shall we identify a main organizer, who would submit the proposal?
If so, then it seems that IGC is the main organizer of 3 out of the 4  
workshops (transboundary, rights agenda, IGF role and mandate) and  
would submit them subject to consensus reaching, while IGP is the  
main organizer of the "internationalization" workshop, will submit  
it, mentioning IGC co-sponsorship.
This would mean that actually IGC is making 3 workshop proposals as  
main organizers, not 4, and is co-sponsoring 1 as for now.

Do we all share this understanding?

On the submission format, I don't see any reason why we shouldn't  
answer more questions than #1, 2, 4 and 9, if answers are ready for a  
given proposal. The more close to final a submission is, the more  
chances we have to see it selected. I agree that we should clean the  
submissions from ongoing process comments.

Meryem

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance