[governance] IGC nomcom process and results

[Meryem Marzouki]

The link is provided in the charter (which itself is at: http:// 
www.igcaucus.org/IGC-charter_final-061014.html). That's were I've  
found it.

But on the main issue, it's neither a detective work, nor a willing  
to criticize this nomcom work, as I've made it clear myself even  
before you post your message on releasing or not names. It's about  
respecting our agreed processes (although I'm still looking for what  
the sentence means exactly, since this is determinant on whether the  
names and applications MUST be released or COULD be released).

Now if you're asking for my own position in our current situation,  
here it is: since the process has not been made clear in advance,  
neither to the candidates, nor to the nomcom members themselves - and  
this is our collective fault - then I can only repeat what I already  
said, for what it's worth: "In such conditions, I understand that,  
most probably, the nomcom felt reluctant on forwarding nominations  
(with names and private details), when nominees were not informed on  
such possibility in advance."

The best would be to restart the process (with same nomcom), with  
prior announcement of the nominees. I don't remember what is the  
deadline for MAG candidates selection. Thus I'm not sure we have time  
to restart the process or to appeal its decision, on a procedural  
matter basis (I'm not even sure a nomcom decision can be appealed,  
actually). Again, we should be better organized..

Meryem


Le 25 avr. 08 à 12:21, Ian Peter a écrit :

>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Meryem Marzouki [mailto:marzouki at ras.eu.org]
>> Sent: 25 April 2008 20:08
>> To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> Subject: Re: [governance] IGC nomcom process and results
>>
>> We definitely need to better organize ourselves:)
>
> Yes...
>
> Meryem the only link to the page you refer to on the website is this
>
> Appeals team
>
> An appeals team of five (5) IGC members will be formed. The appeals  
> board
> will be selected yearly by a randomly selected nominating committee as
> defined in http://www.igcaucus.org/nomcom-process.html.
>
>
> There is no other link from the site (or I can't find it, and nor can
> Google) The fact that the link then refers to all nomcoms is  
> acknowledged
> but anyone looking for a rule which might apply could be forgiven  
> for not
> knowing about this.
>
>
> Congratulations on your detective work, but I would prefer we  
> discuss the
> logic of whether names should be released (you would have seen my  
> posting)
> rather than rely on a precedent which is problematic.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.4/1395 - Release Date:  
> 24/04/2008
> 07:24
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance