[governance] IGC Nomcom - Slate of candidates

[Adam Peake]

>Bill, Meryem and Adam
>
>Thanks for your engagement with the nomcom process. It is good to have these
>open discussions.
>
>A couple of clarifications, as per what I know.
>
>First is the issue of developing criteria for nomination. I gave repeated
>calls, even set aside days, for the caucus to discuss these criteria, and
>requested the nomcom both to listen to the conversation and pick up the
>sense of the caucus, and ask specific questions if found necessary. Though
>such a discussion regarding a few issues did take place a little earlier on
>the list, in this period no one came back to mention or reiterate her/his
>views on criteria for selection.
>
>So I really do not know what you mean Adam when you say
>
>>We didn't even have chance to discuss the kind of qualities we thought the
>>nomcom should look for.


I meant that it wasn't clear there was any 
conclusion to our meandering discussions and any 
instruction given to the nomcom.  But what your 
write below clarifies somewhat, thanks for that.

Adam



>However still the nomcom was specifically requested to pick the sense of the
>caucus on this issue, and wherever information/ clarification was sought
>from co-coordinators they let their view of the discussions on the list
>known. 
>
>We expect a detailed report from the nomcom which will address all issues
>raised here.
>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance