[governance] MAG Nominations: Criteria?

[karen banks]

** a revised subject line, last message had Nomcom nominations - error **

hi everyone

I'm clear on the (revised) timeline

Nomcom starts, and nomination for MAG opens-  April 1st.
Nomination close - April (8th) - extended to April 13th
Nomcom confers between (9th) 13th and 16th.
Nomcom announces names of IGC nominees for MAG - April, 17th

And that we should send nominations to the Chair of the Nomcom - 
Robert Guerra - and members? (is there an address or do we just send 
to all five?

Gurumurthy K - guru at itforchange.net
Ian Peter - ian.peter at ianpeter.com
Robert Guerra - rguerra at lists.privaterra.org
Rudi Rusdiah - rusdiah at rad.net.id
Hakikur Rahman - email at hakik.org

And, criteria.. i'm still not sure what info you need - just a bio, 
some motivation statement?

I dragged out info from the first MAG nomination process - 
http://www.wsis-cs.org/igf.shtml

this is the short criteria form we used - if it is useful, maybe 
others can use - i know some folk have already been nominated or 
self-nominated, but for those who haven't, the following might be 
useful, and it may even be useful for those who have already been 
nominated, to sumit some additional info - shall leave that to the nomcom

 >> the nomination process and criteria
http://www.wsis-cs.org/igfnom.shtml

The nomcom will work until April 18th to prepare a final list of 
candidates. The basic criteria we are using is:
All candidates must be CS participants in the WSIS and post-WSIS 
activities 2 candidates from each of the 5 regions with gender 
balance 5 additional to balance for skill/knowledge set, age, disability, ...

Additionally: anyone can nominate, including members of the nomcom. 
self nominations are invited

At a minimum, all nominations and self nominations should consist of 
the following:

Name
Name of nominator (or self)
Nationality
Country of Residence
Gender
Short Bio relevant to IG
Why the (self)nominee is a good choice for the MAG
Willingness to serve on MAG [if not self-nomination]

If the nomination is not a self-nomination, then the nominator should 
check with the nominated to ensure that she or he is willing to serve.

It would also be useful to indicate that the (self) nominee has the 
ability to handle the additional workload. While the work load is 
uncertain, it will probably involve 1-2 several day meetings in 
Geneva (one is already scheduled May 22-23 2006) and a fair amount of 
email traffic. If the WGIG workload is any indication, there may be 
times, especially as the Athens meeting approaches where this could 
consume at least a day a week.
===

the nomination forms worked quite well - here's an example - rikke 
frank joergensen, nominated by APC at the time:
http://www.wsis-cs.org/igfnominees.shtml?slice_id=3e640adb2506b8421b3f31232657571b&sh_itm=239a3d630d3a1e51b162c69597e177ad

===

karen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20080407/87d6cc8d/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance