[governance] Speakers for IGF - ideas?

Bertrand de La Chapelle bdelachapelle at gmail.com
Wed Sep 5 05:00:34 EDT 2007


Hi all,

At the risk of repeating myself, couldn't the speakers in the main sessions
be drawn in priority from the speakers who will participate in the workshops
related to the corresponding track ? Workshop organizers could play a role
in suggesting some of their speakers to report to the main session.

Speakers in the main session would therefore be mostly introducing
discussion and opening a broader debate in the main session, drawing on the
discussions in the workshops held before or to be held afterwards.

Main advantages : it engages and rewards organizers of workshops, giving
them a say in the selection of speakers; it valorizes the most interesting
workshop speakers; it establishes a natural linkage between the workshops
and the related main session; last but not least, we are more or less sure
that these people have already planned to be there, which is not the case
for the great people we might think of but who do not have yet heard of the
IGF or have not indicated their intention to come.

My two cents.

Best

Bertrand


On 9/4/07, Izumi AIZU <iza at anr.org> wrote:
>
> Hi guys, I am missing the fun! (not quite).
>
> I agree with Jeanette, as much as possible MAG memebrs
> remain out of the speaker pool, but help find them from
> vast resources of great people we have (hopefully).
>
> izumi
>
> 2007/9/5, Jeanette Hofmann <jeanette at wzb.eu>:
> > Hi Adiel (who sits just opposite me :-),
> >
> > last year we decided that MAG members would not speak in the main theme
> > sessions. I would prefer if we keep it that way. Do you think
> > differently about this?
> > jeanette
> >
> > Adiel A. Akplogan wrote:
> > > I would like to suggest Raul Echeberria and Alain P. Aina in
> > > the critical Infrastructure Panel.
> > >
> > > - a.
> > >
> > >> Some time very soon someone will need to decide on speakers for the
> > >> IGF main sessions.
> > >>
> > >> The IGF in Rio starts in about 10 weeks, there is no money to bring
> > >> people (to the best of my knowledge.)  There was general sense from
> > >> the review of the Athens IGF that panels should be smaller, 4, 5 or 6
> > >> people, not the 12-16 we saw in Athens.
> > >>
> > >> The panels must be acceptable to all stakeholders, we should all feel
> > >> our views have an opportunity to be represented.  Somehow these 4, 5
> > >> or 6 people should represent stakeholder, gender, geographic
> > >> diversity, and of course be expert on the issues.
> > >>
> > >> It would be very helpful to hear suggestions as to how to form these
> > >> panels. Perhaps we will be able to find panelists from among the
> > >> workshop participants? Or, can we --the caucus and others-- suggest
> > >> individuals, expert on Critical Internet Resources, Access, Security,
> > >> Openness and Diversity, for these panels?
> > >>
> > >> Anyone suggested should already be planning to be in Rio.
> > >>
> > >> Ideas much appreciated.
> > >>
> > >> There is not time for a neat, open, democratic process. Time ran out
> > >> with the delay in renewing the MAG's membership.  And I don't know
> how
> > >> the advisory group's discussions on speaker selection will pan out
> > >> over the next two days.  So if we make suggestions I can't make any
> > >> promise they'll be accepted.  But we can try, and apologies in
> advance
> > >> if the suggestions can't be taken up.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> Adam
> > >>
> > >
> > >>
>
>
> --
> ____________________
> Bertrand de La Chapelle
> Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32
>
> "Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de Saint
> Exupéry
> ("there is no better mission for humans than uniting humans")
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20070905/521f6e36/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: message-footer.txt
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20070905/521f6e36/attachment.txt>


More information about the Governance mailing list