[governance] problem with the sessions: number of participants
Jeremy Malcolm
Jeremy at Malcolm.id.au
Tue Oct 16 19:49:42 EDT 2007
Adam Peake wrote:
> What do we do?
>
> I think there should be no more than 9 on any session, perhaps 5
> panelists and 4 discussants (5 & 3 better of course.) But that would
> mean dropping a lot of good people. There is no agreement among any
> stakeholder group on who to select.
Surely the "discussants" can just raise their hands like the rest of us.
Last year, much of what came from the floor was more interesting and
provocative than what the panelists had to say. And the sessions should
be required to start on time. That will give everyone more time to be
heard.
--
Jeremy Malcolm LLB (Hons) B Com
Internet and Open Source lawyer, IT consultant, actor
host -t NAPTR 1.0.8.0.3.1.2.9.8.1.6.e164.org|awk -F! '{print $3}'
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list