Hope springs eternal - Re: [governance] Innovation
yehudakatz at mailinator.com
yehudakatz at mailinator.com
Thu Nov 29 11:07:12 EST 2007
Danny,
There maybe no way to gage this, but when it comes to "involvement"
'How much of it is a turn-off'?
There are plenty of "Industrial Insiders, Industrial Lobbyist, or People that
don't want to see the Ralo-AtLarge Structures succeed. Because it is perceived
to effect changes to their ROI/Cash Flow. (They somehow effect Business)
I am sometime incensed by this. It is a turn-off too argue endlessly with the
opposition, who have no concerns for the social development of NetUsers and
impact on Local-Socio-Economic-Systems.
I look at CircleID sometimes, and find its a turn-off for the most part,
because I see it primarily as an Industrial Publication.
Maybe the Mail-List are not severed/defined well enough.
Flaming Liberals on the Left, Industrial Conservatives of the Right.
So participants can find a comfortable environment in which to speak.
IcannAtLarge.Com (liberals) and IcannatLarge.Org (Conservatives) carried on for
quite some time. People could identify the playing field and follow what was
going on.
The 'Structure' of the AtLarge is the 'mental-conception' of perspective &
perception. (i.e.: what people readily identify with / construct).
That's a profound and fundamental area we need to fix.
Oh, and the Jeff Williams factor as well ... "Hope springs eternal" he'll stop
posting.
-
I no longer see Icann as fit for this, the Internet and its
diverse-global-interactivity has out-grown the design.
Lets try a new.
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list