SV: AW: [governance] outcomes of CSTD Bureau meeting

Kicki Nordström kicki.nordstrom at srfriks.org
Thu May 24 15:00:31 EDT 2007


Dear Jeanette, 

Thanks for an understandable and interesting report! It is good to have for us who can not be at spot!
Yours
Kicki  


Kicki Nordström
Synskadades Riksförbund (SRF) 
World Blind Union (WBU)
122 88 Enskede
Sweden
Tel: +46 (0)8 399 000
Fax: +46 (0)8 725 99 20
Cell: +46 (0)70 766 18 19
E-mail: kicki.nordstrom at srfriks.org 

kicki.nordstrom at telia.com (private) 


-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: Jeanette Hofmann [mailto:jeanette at wzb.eu] 
Skickat: den 24 maj 2007 12:08
Till: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Wolfgang
Ämne: Re: AW: [governance] outcomes of CSTD Bureau meeting


Yes, it was already visible yesterday that both China's and Russia's interest in the IGF has significantly increased. China again made very detailed suggestions this morning regarding both the program and the further procedure.
Russia focused on Nitin's report to the SG. The Russian delegate asked if we could see the report of this meeting Nitin Desai prepares for the SG. He insisted that the wording of the report is very important that the draft should therefore be open to everybody.
Nitin conceded that he also includes his on opinion on matters in the report and that this is his right to do so.
The Russian delegate insisted to a point where Nitin offered him to chair the session if he doesn't trust him.
China took up Russia's discomfort regarding the status of the advisory group and the selection procedure of its members. China wants a transparent selection procedure with a result more balanced both regionally and politically.
The longer New York waits with any announcement regarding the future of the advisory group, the more contested its informal status will become.
jeanette


Kleinwächter wrote:
> Thanks Philippe
>  
> the IGF-AG meeting is now open for everybody and it has started with a great confusion about the status of the group and the next steps and who is responsible for what and can report to whom. 
>  
> It is mainly China and Russia government which obviously want to formnlize the whole process in the traditional way, underminding the successful informal character of the IGF so far. And the issue of the Bureau is one vehicle to do that. IGC would make a big mistake to ush for a bureau because at the end of the day CS would be a looser.
>  
> w
>   
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> Von: CONGO - Philippe Dam [mailto:wsis at ngocongo.org]
> Gesendet: Do 24.05.2007 10:45
> An: plenary at wsis-cs.org; bureau at wsis-cs.org; governance at lists.cpsr.org
> Cc: rbloem at ngocongo.org
> Betreff: [governance] outcomes of CSTD Bureau meeting
> 
> 
> 
> Dear all,
> 
>  
> 
> Quick report after the CST Bureau meeting in which observer stakeholder participated. The direction which is now planning to be taken is not having negotiated decisions/resolutions as the outcome of the session, but a series of "agreed conclusions" by the CSTD, annexed to the CSTD report.
> 
>  
> 
> This morning's session is anticipated to be a series of 2 multi-stakeholder interactive dialogues (the first one being on the CSTD traditional mandate, the second on the WSIS follow-up mandate). CS observers could make oral contributions on issues to be included in the agreed conclusions, and could also send written inputs to be included in the agreed conclusions.
> 
>  
> 
> It is still probably that a Decision should be adopted on the CSTD multi-year programme of work, probably based on the CSTD draft concept note, circulated on Monday. 
> 
>  
> 
> The morning CSTD meeting has not started yet. I'll let you know asap when the WSIS follow-up mandate will be addressed and how CS would participate.
> 
>  
> 
> Best,
> 
>  
> 
> Ph
> 
>  
> 
> Philippe Dam
> Conference of NGOs (CONGO)
> Program Officer - WSIS and Human Rights 11, Avenue de la Paix
> CH-1202 Geneva
> Tel: +41 22 301 1000
> Fax: +41 22 301 2000
> E-mail: wsis at ngocongo.org <mailto:wsis at ngocongo.org>
> Website: www.ngocongo.org
> 
>  
> 
> The Conference of NGOs (CONGO) is an international, membership association that facilitates the participation of NGOs in United Nations debates and decisions. Founded in 1948, CONGO's major objective is to ensure the presence of NGOs in exchanges among the world's governments and United Nations agencies on issues of global concern.  For more information see our website at www.ngocongo.org
> 
>  
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance



More information about the Governance mailing list