[governance] bureau

[Mr. Robert Guerra]

Having been on the previous WSIS CS bureau as focal point for North  
America and Europe, let me concur with Bill Drake and others who  
state quite clearly and quite articulately that a "Bureau for CS"  is  
an inappropriate construct for the IGF process.


regards,

Robert
---
Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>
Managing Director, Privaterra
Tel +1 416 893 0377



On 22-May-07, at 6:52 AM, Louis Pouzin wrote:

> Arguments against or in favour of a bureau may be debated  
> endlessly. This is not the real point. In the TA, a MS bureau is an  
> explicit component of the IGF process, but its structure is yet to  
> be determined. Not surprisingly some people or organizations would  
> prefer to rewrite the TA in their own liking. This would be a good  
> recipe for rekindling a power struggle among many constituencies.  
> E.g. some govts, which have accepted the US diktat to keep ICANN's  
> status quo, might decide that after all they don't want ICANN any  
> longer.

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance