[governance] ICANN RFC on its performance

[Mr. Robert Guerra]

Veni:

Two paragraphs in CIRA's comments to the RFC might explain why key  
actors involved in IG and ICANN discussions don't seem to be  
responding as you believe they should...

http://cira.ca/news-releases/201.html

[snipped]

* The Request for Public Comments does not include any background  
documentation or previously developed materials. The questions  
themselves are overly broad: the scope and responses to any of which  
could constitute a demanding consultation in their own right; and

* Inadequate time is permitted for responses. Given the short 30 day  
response period, it is unreasonable to expect respondents will have  
the sufficient time to research and prepare detailed responses to the  
complex, open-ended questions posed by the consultation.


regards,

Robert

On 14-May-07, at 8:39 AM, Veni Markovski wrote:

> Good. Now, it is really interesting to see if anyone will have the  
> courage to sit down and write this as part of the RFC.
> So far at http://forum.icann.org/lists/performance-2007/ there's  
> nothing about it. Or, in other words, whoever raised that topic, is  
> not interested in real progress, but just in having something to  
> say against....argl... about ICANN.
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance