[governance] ICANN RFC on its performance

[Veni Markovski]

I'd like also to say, based on experience, that even though now 
there's a formal call for public comments, ICANN has never stopped 
collecting such responses at every meeting.
One of the achievements of this model is that the Board and the staff 
meet with the community all the time, and often there are written or 
oral statements on ICANN performance. The results are clear for every 
objective observer.
The impact is good from every experience - and sometimes it takes a 
while before some proposals are implemented, just because we live in 
a real world, and it takes time to do things.

veni

At 06:19 5/13/2007  -0700, Joichi Ito wrote:
>While it is more pleasant to receive positive messages, I assure you
>that all arguments and comments are read and digested regardless of
>the packaging. For instance, I believe the CIRA comments are being
>reflected on and discussed sincerely despite the "not so positive"
>tone of the delivery. I do think it's easier to digest more
>constructively worded comments and without putting words in Kieren's
>mouth, I think he was just advising on what sort of thing might make
>the most impact.
>
>IMHO, YMMV, etc.

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance