[governance] ICANN RFC on its performance

[Veni Markovski]

Carlos,
the public here, in this list, participates - one way or the other.
What Kieren is trying to show, is that there's something new in 
today's ICANN. He is not required to be part of this list, but he 
decided to do so, and that's called showing a good will. Of course, 
he, like me before, will soon be blamed for all the "sins" some 
people think ICANN was born with.

As for me - I am not teaching anyone, because I am not a teacher. I 
am giving an example of how to provide solutions. Whether you like 
the example or not (and obviously you don't, as you didn't focus on 
it), is a different story. I wish there will be more people, from 
more countries, to tell us what they've done in their countries, 
instead of exactly teaching us how we should be doing what we do. But 
every time I try to ask this question, there's silence.

veni

At 10:00 5/13/2007  -0300, carlos a. afonso wrote:
>This, mind you, is the response from ICANN's *general manager of public
>participation*!! Is this the view of public participation ICANN encourages??
>
>It seems once some people get a position within ICANN they become
>almighty teachers of how-to and the absolute reference on what is
>acceptable, "positive" or whatever. Kieren only wants "positive",
>"objective" feedback from us stupid students and will discard what he
>thinks are "moanings". Veni teaches poor stubborn Norbert how to write a
>"positive" contribution.
>
>Have you noticed this is a discussion list among peers, whatever our
>jobs, origins, inclinations or expertises?


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance