[governance] ICANN RFC on its performance

[Guru@ITfC]

Amazing.

In any other case, such a report from a member of the board should have led
to the liquidation of that organization. Or at least large scale
restructuring / reform.

I hope Kieren will take in these recommendations.

Guru
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Karl Auerbach [mailto:karl at cavebear.com] 
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2007 1:27 PM
To: Kieren McCarthy
Cc: governance at lists.cpsr.org
Subject: Re: [governance] ICANN RFC on its performance

Kieren McCarthy wrote:

> ICANN has put out a Request for Comments on its performance. And since 
> this list seems to discuss little else, I really think you should 
> review it and get involved.

Why?

Let me point out one such written evaluation of ICANN's performance which
also contains several concrete recommendations.  It is an official ICANN
communication from a sitting board member of ICANN to the entire board of
directors delivered during a public meeting of that board. 
ICANN has never bothered to publish it despite a routine practice of
publishing similar materials.

http://www.cavebear.com/icann-board/icann-evaluation-public-version.pdf

That evaluation is as valid now as it was when published.

		--karl--

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance