[governance] IGC statement to IGF MAG - Yea

[Lee McKnight]

If you push a bit further you can muddy the distinction altogether  between 'Internet public policy issues' broadly which is being discussed in one proposed plenary session and 'ICANN and Core Internet resources' which seems to capture nicely both the specific (ICANN) and the range of institutions, some of whom do a fine job without half the grief ICANN gives and gets.  

So methinks thou doth protest too much, and want to hide the tree in the forest.

Lee

Prof. Lee W. McKnight
School of Information Studies
Syracuse University
+1-315-443-6891office
+1-315-278-4392 mobile

>>> Mawaki Chango <ki_chango at yahoo.com> 5/9/2007 10:48 PM >>>
Lee,
it's not at all being afraid of anything. if you read that
section, ICANN is mentioned several times, but also the RIRs
which are different legal entities and have their own processes.
And if you push a little bit further, you may even fit in
(between the lines, of course) WIPO which implements a major
ICANN-related/initiated policy regarding core Internet
resources. So I thought ICANN shouldn't be the tree that hides
the forest.

Mawaki


--- Lee McKnight <LMcKnigh at syr.edu> wrote:

> I support the text as is, and the titles as they are - I still
> don;t get why we're afraid to say 'ICANN' in public. 
> 
> Lee
> 
> Prof. Lee W. McKnight
> School of Information Studies
> Syracuse University
> +1-315-443-6891office
> +1-315-278-4392 mobile
> 
> >>> jeanette at wzb.eu 5/9/2007 1:38 PM >>>
> I support the text and Mawaki's suggestion regarding the
> header of no 2.
> 
> jeanette
> 
> Mawaki Chango wrote:
> > I support.
> > I'd advise though to remove ICANN from the heading 2, but
> not
> > from the text. Instead of :
> > 
> > "(2) ICANN and Core Internet Resources"
> > we could have
> > "(2) Core Internet Resources and current governance
> > institutions"
> > or a variant of that.
> > 
> > Mawaki
> > 
> > --- Carlos Afonso <ca at rits.org.br> wrote:
> > 
> >> No kiss of death -- we will protest! We will not just send
> the
> >> proposal 
> >> and wait... I assume we are engaged in disseminating and
> >> lobbying for 
> >> our positions in our constituencies (and, in some cases,
> with
> >> our 
> >> governments as well). In any case, we can negotiate a word
> >> replacement 
> >> (meaning the same, of course) later on in the actual
> debate.
> >> We can 
> >> replace, for example, "ICANN" with "core resources such as
> the
> >>
> >> administration/governance of names, numbers and
> protocols..."
> >> :)
> >>
> >> --c.a.
> >>
> >> DRAKE William wrote:
> >>> Milton Mueller wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I fully agree with Carlos, both about delivering it now,
> >> and about the
> >>>> title. Thanks, Parminder for putting it together. 
> >>> Has there been a formal consensus call, and that's what
> >> we're responding 
> >>> to here?  If so what's the time frame?
> >>>
> >>> I'm a yes on both of the above, although it occurs to me
> >> that there was 
> >>> never any follow up discussion on Adam's argument that
> >> framing #2 in 
> >>> terms of ICANN rather than just core resources would be
> the
> >> kiss of 
> >>> death mAG-wise.  But as the clock is running down and we
> >> have no 
> >>> alternative language to consider, I guess we'll just see
> how
> >> it goes, 
> >>> assuming the proposal gets through the IGC process.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Bill
> >>>
> ____________________________________________________________
> >>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> >>>     governance at lists.cpsr.org 
> >>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> >>>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org 
> >>>
> >>> For all list information and functions, see:
> >>>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> -- 
> >>
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> Carlos A. Afonso
> >> diretor de planejamento
> >> Rede de Informações para o Terceiro Setor - Rits
> >> http://www.rits.org.br 
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>
> >>
> ____________________________________________________________
> >> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> >>      governance at lists.cpsr.org 
> >> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> >>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org 
> >>
> >> For all list information and functions, see:
> >>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance 
> >>
> > 
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> >      governance at lists.cpsr.org 
> > To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> >      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org 
> > 
> > For all list information and functions, see:
> >      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org 
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>      governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org 
> 
> For all list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance 
> 
> 

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance