[governance] Programme outline and schedule released

[Carlos Afonso]

Veni Markovski wrote:
> I hope we can try to be more constructive, and decide first what COULD 
> be discussed, and not use try to define what the IGF SHOULD do, and 
> stressing that several times (see below quotes)?

Interesting point of view... who determines the "could"? Is this a 
multistakeholder environment or a bunch of order followers??

 > ...article 72, for example, should be read
> fully, not sentence by sentence, and not half sentences only. Here's a 
> simple example:
> 
> 72 point a says: Discuss public policy issues related to key elements of 
> Internet governance in order to foster the sustainability, robustness, 
> security, stability and development of the Internet

and point "j" says:

j. Discuss, inter alia, issues relating to critical Internet resources;

Read it in full, as per your own recommendation, Veni.

--c.a.


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance