[governance] Muti-stakeholder Group structure (some ideas)

[Jeremy Malcolm]

Jeanette Hofmann wrote:
>> ). And as IGC co-coordinator even informal rules of closed interactions
>> seemed more important than they need to against imperatives of public
>> interest disclosures, which in the present case I think are 
>> overwhelming...
> 
> I am not sure I correctly interpret what you said in that sentence 
> above. If you meant to say that in this case public disclosure is more 
> important than respecting the chatham house rule, then I would like to 
> object.

If the Advisory Group has adopted the Chatham House rule, this can 
hardly apply to Guru who is not a member of the Advisory Group.  Take 
whomever leaked the emails in the first place to task, if anyone.

-- 
Jeremy Malcolm LLB (Hons) B Com
Internet and Open Source lawyer, IT consultant, actor
host -t NAPTR 1.0.8.0.3.1.2.9.8.1.6.e164.org|awk -F! '{print $3}'
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance