[governance] Muti-stakeholder Group structure (some ideas)

Jeremy Malcolm Jeremy at Malcolm.id.au
Sat Jun 9 07:28:40 EDT 2007

Jeanette Hofmann wrote:
>> ). And as IGC co-coordinator even informal rules of closed interactions
>> seemed more important than they need to against imperatives of public
>> interest disclosures, which in the present case I think are 
>> overwhelming...
> I am not sure I correctly interpret what you said in that sentence 
> above. If you meant to say that in this case public disclosure is more 
> important than respecting the chatham house rule, then I would like to 
> object.

If the Advisory Group has adopted the Chatham House rule, this can 
hardly apply to Guru who is not a member of the Advisory Group.  Take 
whomever leaked the emails in the first place to task, if anyone.

Jeremy Malcolm LLB (Hons) B Com
Internet and Open Source lawyer, IT consultant, actor
host -t NAPTR|awk -F! '{print $3}'
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:

More information about the Governance mailing list