[governance] Muti-stakeholder Group structure - Is WGIG a good model

[Norbert Bollow]

Parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:

> I wonder if it is not possible for IGF to move towards some kind of an IGF
> 'committee' (or some such thing, as someone pointed out we need to look for
> linguistic innovations like did in the case of 'dynamic coalitions') modeled
> on the WGIG which gave non-binding recommendations.

Sounds like a good idea to me.

Greetings,
Norbert.


-- 
Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch>                    http://Norbert.ch
President of the Swiss Internet User Group SIUG  http://SIUG.ch
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance