AW: AW: [governance] Enhanced cooperation

[Nnenna]

I do agree here that we need to ask for ''modalities'' of the next IGF meeting.  Then we could proceed from there.  But I believe that whether or not a response is given or not (pending on who has to respond and the time he has or what governments think) the caucus still needs to contribute
   
  Happy New Year
   
  Nnenna

Wolfgang Kleinwächter <wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote:
  Jeanette:
Why disturbing the funeral? Enhanced cooperation seems such a dead horse...

Wolfgang:
Yes and no. It depends whih has what kind of ambitions and interest to make trouble. To be prepared for such a situation is probably not so bad. 



w




____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance


 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20070108/07210b27/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: message-footer.txt
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20070108/07210b27/attachment.txt>