[governance] Statement for Feb 13, version 2

[Jeremy Malcolm]

Vittorio Bertola wrote:
> Now to make things even clearer, this is the text that I would add, 
> building on Adam's initial suggestion (more suggestions welcome), if 
> consensus was for "yes": "We think that, as per comma (j) of the IGF 
> mandate, the legal nature and working structure of ICANN should be among 
> the matters discussed in Rio, as long as they do not prevent the IGF 
> from paying adequate attention to all the other themes.". This would 
> replace the part where we say there is no consensus among us on this, 
> while I'd still keep the bit on making the enhanced cooperation process 
> more transparent.

I am mildly in favour.

-- 
Jeremy Malcolm LLB (Hons) B Com
Internet and Open Source lawyer, IT consultant, actor
host -t NAPTR 1.0.8.0.3.1.2.9.8.1.6.e164.org|awk -F! '{print $3}'
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance