[governance] MAG future

[Jeremy Malcolm]

Taran Rampersad wrote:
> Vittorio Bertola wrote:
>> The real problem is that the IGF was born with high hopes, but was
>> quickly dragged downwards by power struggles, short-sightedness and
>> crossed fears.
>>
>> I agree with Bertrand, civil society should focus on preparing and
>> presenting a proposal for the post-Rio IGF that restores the initial
>> hopes, finding a way to implement the mandate that is not threatening
>> to the Internet community, and ensuring some clarity, transparency and
>> democracy in the internal procedures of the IGF.
> Concur.

I also concur.  Maybe you would be interested in reading chapter 6 of my 
PhD thesis (now complete in draft) which aims to present just such a 
proposal in detail.  Browse or download it from 
http://www.malcolm.id.au/thesis.

-- 
Jeremy Malcolm LLB (Hons) B Com
Internet and Open Source lawyer, IT consultant, actor
host -t NAPTR 1.0.8.0.3.1.2.9.8.1.6.e164.org|awk -F! '{print $3}'
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance