[governance] IG and its linkage to technology

[Karl Auerbach]

Nyangkwe Agien Aaron wrote:

> The topic is commendable in that it can enable the mapping of outcome
> as we take into account the different interests of all partners
> -strategic/boundary.The topic further tickles in the handling of the
> technological aspect of IG

> Let the debate roll, therefore.

Thanks for the positive response.

It is perhaps a bit premature to begin a debate.  The issue needs to be 
framed with much greater precision.  And, as has been mentioned, there 
are other possible topics.

And any discussion of these matters requires the presence of the people 
and groups who have the primary knowledge about the machinery that such 
governance would affect: ISPs.

When I've thought about the topic of a system to obtain end-to-end path 
quality assurance (and again, I emphasize, not guarantees) I've felt 
that the outcome, whatever it is, should be a soft system that permits 
and enables ISPs and end users (or end-ISPs representing their users) to 
cooperate rather than a more rigid system that would require such 
cooperation.

		--karl--

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance