[governance] Is ICANN "engaged in commerce" ?

Tue Apr 10 09:55:02 EDT 2007

Dear all,

ICCAN from its manifesto as expressed by Bertrand appears to be a
public utility. Now that it is evident as Karl said that ICCAN is
moving towards commercial. What ar the pending impacts on IG? What
effect to ntwork neutrality et al?
Best regards
Aaron

On 4/9/07, Bertrand de La Chapelle <bdelachapelle at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/9/07, in the middle of a relatively long post related to the
> RegisterFly debacle, yehudakatz at mailinator.com wrote:
> > Like it or not, ICANN is engaged in commerce, not charity work, although
> it is a California nonprofit corporation.
>
> This justifies going back to the basic texts.
>
> Many non-English speaking actors, particularly outside the United States,
> tend to interpret the term "Corporation" as an equivalent of "Company",
> implicitly connecting ICANN with the notion of market and commercial
> activity. This misunderstanding is aggravated by the repeated use of the
> term "private" when refering to the legal status of the organization (for
> instance in the President's Strategic Committee Report). And the fact that
> ICANN is actively coordinating a market compounds the feeling that it is
> "engaged in commerce".
>
>
>
> It is therefore useful to quote extensively Paragraph 3 of ICANN's Articles
> of Incorporation:
>
>
>
> ICANN "is a nonprofit public benefit corporation […] organized under the
> California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law for charitable and
> public purposes. [It] is organized, and will be operated, exclusively for
> charitable, educational and scientific purposes […]".
>
>
> This unequivocally underscores the public interest nature and purpose of
> ICANN. ICANN is not "engaged in commerce" but is a structure set up to serve
> the global public interest. Too many people seem to forget it.
>
> Best
>
> Bertrand
>
>
>
>
>
> On 4/9/07, yehudakatz at mailinator.com <yehudakatz at mailinator.com > wrote:
> > Judging from this mail-list response, no members have had experience
> first-hand with RegisterFly, which means there is a lack of sufficient
> numbers to form a 'CLASS' by this body (IGC). What was of interest in Mr.
> Hanson's article, was the statement which suggests that ICANN was moving
> toward an 'Independent' International Model: such as the Red Cross and The
> International Olympic Community, to take refuge by Flight (flight from legal
> prosecution). I wonder under which Court of International Law could a
> similar Suit be brought by Plaintiffs who domicile outside of the US
> Jurisdiction? - Article Re: In the wake of RegisterFly, is ICANN taking
> flight?
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/04/05/icann_registerfly_litigation
> Only the paranoid survive By Burke Hansen in San Francisco In the aftermath
> of the ICANN meeting in Lisbon, the RegisterFly disaster continues to
> inspire both litigation and paranoia. Those connecting the dots are
> convinced that an ICANN report debated at the Lisbon meetings exploring the
> possibility of changing ICANN to an international organization along the
> lines of the International Red Cross is an attempt by ICANN to slither out
> of this whole mess. A plaintiff in North Carolina has started a class action
> against RegisterFly, Enom, and ICANN over her ruined business; ICANN is
> suing RegisterFly to force it to turn over the authcodes to enable a bulk
> transfer of domains; and RegisterFly is demanding arbitration as provided
> for in its Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA). Other plaintiffs wait in
> the wings. A change of character for ICANN would provide a gloss of
> independence from the smothering bosom of the American Department of
> Commerce (DOC), as well as potential protection from American litigation. It
> would also comport with ICANN's stated goal of becoming a truly
> international organization reflective of the international reach of the
> internet itself. Of course, it begs the question: just what does ICANN have
> in common with the Red Cross? And why would ICANN need a structure that
> virtually eliminates accountability when more accountability is what the
> ICANN stakeholders keep demanding? ICANN has made great strides in providing
> improved access and clarity to its website recently, and it would be
> unfortunate if ICANN has adopted a one step forward, two steps back approach
> to its problems. ICANN currently is a nonprofit corporation based in Marina
> Del Ray, California. Say what you will about the litigious nature of
> American society, but American-style litigation keeps us all on our toes,
> including ICANN. Why would ICANN need Red Cross-style international legal
> protections when it's not out saving refugees and inoculating babies like
> the Red Cross? The international organization that ICANN does have something
> in common with is one famous for its opaqueness and arrogant lack of
> accountability, the International Olympic Committee (IOC). ICANN's not
> saving the world. Like it or not, ICANN is engaged in commerce, not charity
> work, although it is a California nonprofit corporation. The IOC, too, is
> engaged in commerce, which is marketing the Olympics and extorting stadium
> facilities out of local communities. It would be unfortunate if ICANN were
> to take advantage of the RegisterFly mess as an excuse to lock itself away
> from public opinion the way the IOC has. Of course, ICANN is already named
> in the RegisterFly class action, and no midstream change in corporate
> structure will get them out of that lawsuit. It would, however, make it more
> difficult for similar lawsuits to proceed in the future. A move to
> Switzerland, say, would be even more frustrating. Considering the fact that
> ICANN did not drop the hammer on RegisterFly until after the plaintiff's
> attorneys dropped the hammer on ICANN, the ICANN community might think twice
> about letting ICANN off the hook.(r) Burke Hansen, Attorney at large, heads a
> San Francisco law office. --
> >
> ____________________________________________________________
> > You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> >     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> > To be removed from the list, send any message to:
> >     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
> >
> > For all list information and functions, see:
> >     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> ____________________
> Bertrand de La Chapelle
> Délégué Spécial pour la Société de l'Information / Special Envoy for the
> Information Society
> Ministère des Affaires Etrangères / French Ministry of Foreign Affairs
> Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32
>
> "Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de Saint
> Exupéry
> ("there is no better mission for humans than uniting humans")
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>

-- 
Aaron Agien Nyangkwe
Journalist/Outcome Mapper
Special Assistant To The President
ASAFE
P.O.Box 5213
Douala-Cameroon
Tel. 237 337 50 22
Fax. 237 342 29 70
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance