[governance] IQL Proposal (was: the continuing NN debate)

[Norbert Bollow]

David Allen <David_Allen_AB63 at post.harvard.edu> wrote:

> Of course, it is the _process_ of multi-stakeholder participation
> that IGF has opportunity to move forward - what are the conditions
> for that process to work, and so forth.
> 
> Along that way, the extent that CS organizes itself to be an
> effective partner, particularly to trial innovations in process,
> with some robustness, can contribute to useful outcomes.

YES!!!

I agree wholeheartedly, and this is in fact the reason why the
Internet Quality Labels proposal
http://intgovforum.org/Substantive_1st_IGF/SwissInternetUserGroup.txt
has such a big section on multistakeholder accountability.

I'd like to request everyone's advice please on how to proceed
with this in order to create a true multistakeholder process
around this idea.

My current plan for the next step is to ask various organizations,
as well as individuals who have a reputation that implies some
credibility, for endorsements, giving them the opportunity to
publish on the IQL endorsements page a brief text outlining their
paricular perspective on the matter.

Greetings,
Norbert.


-- 
Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch>                       http://Norbert.ch
President of the Swiss Internet User Group SIUG        http://SIUG.ch
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance