AW: [governance] Re: Elections for coordinators

[Wolfgang Kleinwächter]

David is right. We have to live with our procedures. If we have only two candidates and two seats and people do not feel comfortable with the situation they have an option to be a candidate next year. The rotation system we have adopted allows an annual 50 per cent renewal. Lets move foreward and discuss real issues. After we have GIGANET for academic research, the CS IGC could be much clearer an "advocacy group", representing Individual Internet Users. The IGC should do also more outreach and, where useful and necessary, coordinate its activities with related bodies like CONGO or ALAC. What about "IGC liaisons" to other bodies?
 
Wolfgang
   

________________________________

Von: David Allen [mailto:David_Allen_AB63 at post.harvard.edu]
Gesendet: Di 07.11.2006 00:01
An: governance at lists.cpsr.org
Betreff: [governance] Re: Elections for coordinators



Avri has made clear the time for nominations has passed.

It is time for the caucus to live by its procedures and make clear to
the rest of the world that it can do so.  Some credibility can be the
dividend.  Equally, option 1 seems like the reasonable approach.

David
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance