[governance] IGF conclusions

[Vittorio Bertola]

Adam Peake ha scritto:
> This is what I now understand too.  There is no official conclusion of
> the IGF. There will be a report to the Sec General will give to the UN
> GA (required by Tunis Agenda), but we don't know what that will be
> like.

Fine, then - but we should ensure that we get no surprises - ie it does 
not contain any substantive statement on the issues that's presented as 
"consensus of the IGF", but just "contentless" factual reporting.
-- 
vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance