[governance] Transition

[Parminder]

Yes, I think what Nnenna outlines is pretty elaborate, especially with an
etc in the end :). 

Meanwhile, should we take it that we have two more days for someone to
clearly object to Avri being the single coordinator, and then - in default -
she is the single coordinator. And of course as much time to object to this
proposition itself. 
 

Parminder  

________________________________________________
Parminder Jeet Singh
IT for Change, Bangalore
Bridging Development Realities and Technological Possibilities 
91-80-26654134
www.ITforChange.net 
-----Original Message-----
From: governance-bounces at lists.cpsr.org
[mailto:governance-bounces at lists.cpsr.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2006 10:19 PM
To: Nnenna
Cc: Internet Governance Caucus
Subject: Re: [governance] Transition

hi,

I tend to agree, that is why I have been speaking of a working charter.

And thanks for the outline.

a.

On 2 maj 2006, at 08.41, Nnenna wrote:

> I really believe that the idea of a charter is not as grandiose as  
> some may feel.  There are two types of it:
> 1.  The elaborate type that seems to cover all,
> 2.  The easier version which lays down principles.
>
> These  days, the second option has proved to be more efficient.   
> Going by what I know, the IGC charter can/may consist of the  
> following:
> Vision
> Aim/mission
> Objectives
> Tasks
> Membership
> Coordination
> Working methods
> Decisions
> Relationship of IGC to CSP
> etc
> All for now

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance