[governance] A process suggestion for IGF nominations

[Ken Lohento]

1. Re: the comments below

I don't want to say I disagree with Adam and Tim for their comments below,
but I think it's crucial to ensure that all regions are *adequately*
represented (because, put it simply, you are the only one that can better
voice your crucial concerns). Maybe regional representation will not prove
very appropriate because of the feeble number of *available* "knowledgeable"
human resources we have regarding IG issues in some regions, but from the
beginning, we must ensure that the process is really inclusive and will
serve all regions.

2. Regarding the Nomcom, well, it will be challenging mainly because of time
management, but I volunteer for that.

>From Senegal (via Benin) Ken Lohento
+221 849 16 65
Skype ID: lohento

-----Message d'origine-----
De : governance-bounces at lists.cpsr.org
[mailto:governance-bounces at lists.cpsr.org]De la part de McTim
Envoye : jeudi 23 mars 2006 13:09
A : ajp at glocom.ac.jp
Cc : governance at lists.cpsr.org
Objet : Re: [governance] A process suggestion for IGF nominations

On 3/23/06, Adam Peake (ajp at glocom.ac.jp) <apeake at gmail.com> wrote:

>  I need to think a bit more about the advisory group, I'm interested,
> problem might be finding time. But I don't particularly like the idea of
> regional representation (for myself at least.)

I'm with Adam on all of the above.

--
Cheers,

McTim
$ whois -h whois.afrinic.net mctim

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance


_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance