[governance] Going forward - Role of the governance caucus
David Allen
David_Allen_AB63 at post.harvard.edu
Thu Mar 2 20:26:09 EST 2006
At 11:52 PM +0100 3/2/06, Avri Doria wrote:
>On 2 mar 2006, at 23.36, Milton Mueller wrote:
>
>>>>> Meryem Marzouki <marzouki at ras.eu.org> 3/2/2006 2:01 PM >>>
>>> we'll face
>>> the following alternative: either this caucus/mailing list
>>> becomes the plenary or plenary-like space, or the whole
>>> CS @ WSIS should reconsider its structuring, starting from
>>> caucuses.
>>
>> I think both are already happening. IGC list should continue to
>> evolve into the CS plenary and new sub-groupings should form around
>> it.
>
>but aren't there all the follow up and Implementation efforts that
>need special places to work out whatever they want to work out.
>
>and doesn't the CS plenary remain the place where all the different
>interest can still coordinate.
>
>while i may steeped in IG, i see a lot of other stuff that i hope
>there are enough people putting effort into. i see IG as very
>important, but somehow don't see all relevant ICT civil society
>efforts as boiling down to just IG.
>
>a.
Again, this seems right to me.
David
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance
More information about the Governance
mailing list