[governance] Going forward - Role of the governance caucus

David Allen David_Allen_AB63 at post.harvard.edu
Thu Mar 2 20:26:09 EST 2006


At 11:52 PM +0100 3/2/06, Avri Doria wrote:
>On 2 mar 2006, at 23.36, Milton Mueller wrote:
>
>>>>>  Meryem Marzouki <marzouki at ras.eu.org> 3/2/2006 2:01 PM >>>
>>>  we'll face
>>>  the following alternative: either this caucus/mailing list
>>>  becomes  the plenary or plenary-like space, or the whole
>>>  CS @ WSIS should reconsider its structuring, starting from
>>>  caucuses.
>>
>>  I think both are already happening. IGC list should continue to 
>>  evolve into the CS plenary and new sub-groupings should form around 
>>  it.
>
>but aren't there all the follow up and Implementation efforts that 
>need special places to work out whatever they want to work out.
>
>and doesn't the CS plenary remain the place where all the different 
>interest can still coordinate.
>
>while i may steeped in IG, i see a lot of other stuff that i hope 
>there are enough people putting effort into.  i see IG as very 
>important, but somehow don't see all relevant ICT civil society
>efforts as boiling down to just IG.
>
>a.

Again, this seems right to me.

David
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance



More information about the Governance mailing list