[governance] IGF next steps

[Raul Echeberria]

I think that these questions have been already 
answered both in the public comments and in the meeting last week.

Raúl


At 01:08 p.m. 20/02/2006, Avri Doria wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The IGF web site has been updated: http://www.intgovforum.org/
>especially noteworthy are the calls for contributions on:
>
>- Whether there is a need for a multistakeholder group to prepare for
>the meeting.
>- Which public policy issues the first meeting of the IGF should
>address.
>
>All stakeholders are invited to submit their views on these questions.
>
>Please let us know what your views are on:
>
>a) The need for a multistakeholder group to assist the the Secretary-
>General in convening the IGF, what the mandate of this group should
>be and how it should be formed.
>Please submit your comments by 28 February 2006.
>
>b) Public policy issues to be discussed at the first meeting of the IGF.
>Please let us know your top three choices and give a short
>explanation on the reasons for your choices by 31 March 2006.
>
>a.
>
>_______________________________________________
>governance mailing list
>governance at lists.cpsr.org
>https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.11/264 - Release Date: 17/02/2006



_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance