[governance] Transition

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

i think it might mean the loss of the IGC and its history and the  
role it has been able to achieve.
or what might happen, is that some people will go off and start  
working on the new working group, while the rest of the people stay  
on IGC and eventually figure it out.

but of course, someone can do this anytime, it does not take a  
decision of the IGC for someone to go off and start something new.

a.

On 30 apr 2006, at 13.29, Vittorio Bertola wrote:

> Avri Doria ha scritto:
>> anyone have a idea?
>
> Sure - why don't we just freeze the caucus, start up an open working
> group, including whoever wants to join, to draft a charter, and see
> whether we can reach consensus on the practicalities of a revised
> structure? If we do, we might get out of this deadlock.
> -- 
> vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org] 
> <-----
> http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...
>
>

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance