[governance] Caucus Position on Oversight?

[carlos a. afonso]

Everything flows (or should) indeed! :)

Thanks, Wolf!

--c.a.

-----Original Message-----
From: Wolfgang Kleinwächter <wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de>
To: Raul Echeberria <raul at lacnic.net>, governance at lists.cpsr.org
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 09:25:19 +0200
Subject: Re: [governance] Caucus Position on Oversight?

> Raul:
> I agree with the idea of "non binding" forum only in the scenario
> proposed by Jeanette, what means that any new function of the forum
> should be supported by all the stakeholders. Other comment: non
> binding is not exactly the same than "(with as many
> additional functions as it is possible to negotiate-- and these might
> happen in steps after the forum is created)".  We have to be careful.
> 
> Wolfgang:
> Pantha Rei. We should make first steps first and keep options open
> for the future. Think big, start small, move fast.
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> governance mailing list
> governance at lists.cpsr.org
> https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance


_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance