[governance] Parminder on Canada

[William Drake]

I agree with him.  The proposal to move the forum to section 4 on
development would indicate that they didn't just goof and make omissions,
they want to spin it toward ICT4D, which I would see as entirely
consistent with their larger policy stance.

BD

> -----Original Message-----
> From: plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org [mailto:plenary-admin at wsis-cs.org]On
> Behalf Of Parminder
> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 11:21 AM
> To: plenary at wsis-cs.org
> Subject: [WSIS CS-Plenary] Canada's proposal on IG forum - its
> COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE
>
>
>
>
> Thanks Jeanette, I will very much like believe that canadians
> just goofed up,
> but I know this is not true. The issues implied here have too long, and
> consistent, a history in North-south geo-politics for this to be true.
>
> And I have reasoned them in my email - for instance, canada's
> offer to move
> the 'forum' part to section 4 on 'IG and development' from its present
> location in section 5 on 'the way forward'. So obviuosly they
> really know what
> they are doing. The approach is too systematic for them not to....
>
> Parminder
>



_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance