[governance] [WSIS CS-Plenary] slight postponement oftoday's caucus meeting

[McTim]

Hi Carlos,

Nice to finally meet you yesterday.

On 9/21/05, carlos a. afonso <ca at rits.org.br> wrote:
<snip>
>
> paragraph 48 of the WGIG report, among other reasons. If we endorse the
> statement as a consensus, we are in practice almost doing what ICANN
> wants us to do, ie., defend the creation of an innocuous
> consultative/advisory forum which might never be really taken seriously.

a. How do you know what ICANN wants you to do?

b. Why do you think a Forum (function) wouldn't be taken seriously?

>
> understood otherwise. Many of these delegates also wrongly associate
> model 2 of the WGIG report with the civil society caucus -- we must
> recall model 2 was built under the influence of ICANN-related people and
> business reps in the WGIG. Do we really want this perception to stay?

Well Model 2 is the one that gives CS the greatest voice.  If CS
supports model 2 more than any of the other models, why spend cycles
on caring about perception?

--
Cheers,

McTim
nic-hdl:      TMCG

_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance