[governance] Adding ONE New Address Space vs. Billions

[Jim Fleming]

Adding ONE New Address Space vs. Billions

The free and open marketplace (at least in the .USA), when presented with an
opportunity
to add billions of address spaces appears to favor the addition of ONE more
space. There
appears to be a wide-spread feeling that people collectively want ONE more
shot at
getting it right, a second-chance. They now see the results of THE Big Lie
Society. The
52 people are well-known, their methods and motives are well-known, their
agenda is
well-known. People now see how to NOT do it, and seem to want to have ONE
more
shot at getting it right, rather than billions of chances.

There is certainly merit in the grow-the-net via ONE more address space
approach.
It is certainly much easier and NAT devices (PE devices) make it very easy.
In the DMZ
between the PE and CE devices, ONE new address space can evolve. Packets
using that
address space can be tagged. There is a spare bit (bit 49) to do it.

One of the dangers of growing the .NET via ONE more address space is that
THE Big
Lie Society will certainly be ready to jump to the front of the line to
control and live off the
revenue from taxing that one new address space. If there were billions of
new address
spaces, there may be less chance for THE Big Lie Society to game that
system. As people
are seeing, that is not the case.

If one trusts the hidden and silent hand that directs the free and open
marketplace, then,
the much easier, lower-cost, higher-performance, more familiar, method of
adding ONE
more address space will likely help to free the most people from THE Big Lie
Society
domination. The risk is that the free people will find themselves in a not
much larger garden
than the one THE Big Lie Society cultivates for them. They may have a second
chance
but only one chance to get it right. The risk is reduced by the fact that to
move to ONE new
address space, fairly managed, it becomes more clear how to move to many
more, including
billions more and IF people fail a second time, they will have more chances
to get it right.

When THE Big Lie Society made promises about getting it right the second and
third and
fourth times, it became clear there was no real intention to ever get it
right. They lie. That
is why they are called THE Big Lie Society. They have no intention of
getting it right. When
presented with a simple choice of good vs. evil, they choose evil. When
presented with a
clear choice of a corrupt organization set to run an illegal lottery vs. a
straight and narrow
bidder, they choose the corrupt organization. When presented with a choice
of something
that works now vs. later, they deny the working system exists and choose the
future system
and define it and tax it and claim it existed, when it did not. They even
lie about history and
who invented what when. One thing for sure, many many people see that THE
Big Lie
Society can not be trusted and will never change. What people do not
understand is that
they can not change. Their name, THE Big Lie Society, defines who they are.
They like it
that way. They thrive on it. They can not seem to wait to get to their next
meat-space meeting
to rub shoulders with their cronies.

THE Big Lie Society is composed of 52 people who conspire to control network
resources and content for their personal gain. If one of the people dies,
there is always another person that has been groomed to take their position
in THE Big Lie Society. Their names, faces and history can easily be
documented on a deck of playing cards. They will do almost anything or pay
people to do anything to be part of that deck of cards.




_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance