[governance] Statement made in Plenary

[Vittorio Bertola]

Avri Doria ha scritto:
>>>There should be a process for extraordinary appeal of ICANN'S  
>>>decisions in the form of an independent multi-stakeholder review  
>>>commission invoked on a case-by-case basis.
> 
> hmmm.  we used a should here.  i guess the question for us is why is  
> this only a should.  is there any case in which it is not reasonable  
> for a process to be established that could be used on a case by case  
> basis as required?

I guess that's because we were thinking as human beings, not as 
engineers... so "should" means "we think that there must be one, but if 
everyone else disagrees, we can live without it".
-- 
vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance