[governance] oversight

[Lee McKnight]

Or a multistakeholder study group?  With the input process others have supported already of course.

I bet a biz group or 2 might volunteer, maybe even a eurocrat if I understand correctly where the EU claims its policy push is going....

Lee

Prof. Lee W. McKnight
School of Information Studies
Syracuse University
+1-315-443-6891office
+1-315-278-4392 mobile

>>> Wolfgang Kleinwächter <wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de> 10/25/2005 10:10 PM >>>
Has my full support. Late for Tunis, but could become one of the decisions by the CS IG Tunis Declaration.
 
 
wolfgang
 

________________________________

Von: governance-bounces at lists.cpsr.org im Auftrag von Avri Doria
Gesendet: Mi 26.10.2005 02:19
An: wcurrie at apc.org 
Cc: WSIS Internet Governance Caucus
Betreff: Re: [governance] oversight



Hi,


On 25 okt 2005, at 18.28, wcurrie at apc.org wrote:
>
>
> or is there a role for the IG caucus to appoint ten people as a 
> citizen's
> commission to produce a *Green Paper* proposal for ICANN independence,
> hold virtial hearings on it and make a considered *White Paper* 
> proposal
> to ICANN, UN and USG about it?
>


i like this idea.

a.
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org 
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance 


_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org 
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance


_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance