[governance] oversight

[Vittorio Bertola]

Adam Peake ha scritto:
> How about:
> 
> "Appropriate commitments by a host government should provide 
> privileges and immunities to ICANN to ensure that it is able to 
> provide global service in accordance with its bylaws and mission. 
> Such binding commitments should ensure that:
> * decisions taken by ICANN cannot be overturned by any single government;
> * all countries and stakeholders have the opportunity to access the 
> resources managed by ICANN and its related entities;
> * ICANN is able to enter into commercial and other agreements in 
> keeping with requirements of its bylaws and mission, enabling it to 
> provide and receive DNS services globally, and
> * all stakeholders have the opportunity to participate in ICANN's 
> Internet governance processes, without being affected by the policies 
> of any single government."

I like your rewriting of my text, I think there's consensus on the list, 
let's keep this as one para of our statement, ok? (I would just add "We 
recommend / propose / request / whatever" in front of it, as that's the 
general style of the Tunis declaration.)
-- 
vb.             [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<-----
http://bertola.eu.org/  <- Prima o poi...
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance