[governance] Comments on Food for Thought paper (oversight)

[Robert Guerra]

The (pakistani) Chair mentioned earlier that his "Food for thought  
paper" was supposed to developed in such a way that (only) took in  
the common elements exist between all the difference proposals. Did  
that happen? I don't think so ... Did he favour one paper vs.  
another.. ? perhaps..


Perhaps now you understand my suggestion that the caucus try to do  
the "exercise" of finding the common elements . You never know, we  
might end up doing a better job then the chair...



regards,

Robert

--
Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org>
Managing Director, Privaterra <http://www.privaterra.org>





On 18-Oct-05, at 8:38 AM, Jeanette Hofmann wrote:

> Hi, Ian,
>
> good start!
> My comments on your comments...
>
>
>
>> My Comments on Chair's Food for Thought Paper
>>
>> Oversight
>> 68.    OVERSIGHT
>> The Food for Thought paper calls for examination of an oversight  
>> model at the
>> end of a transitionary period.


_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance at lists.cpsr.org
https://ssl.cpsr.org/mailman/listinfo/governance